Skip to content

FaHCSIA home | NTER Review home

Anonymous

My personal experience:

I have been employed as part of the NTER.

On my first trip to a remote community, I saw an 18 year old man with a cleft lip and palate that had not been repaired and who had not received any speech pathology intervention. His coping mechanisms were to grow a moustache and, not surprisingly, he didn’t talk to me. I use this example to demonstrate the lack of primary and allied health services for people living in remote communities. In making a case for more allied health professionals to be involved in the NTER, please consider why is there an 18 year old with a cleft lip and palate who hasn’t received speech pathology intervention living in Australia.

Working within the NTER system, I have experienced:

Responses to some of the specific questions asked of the NTER review board are below:

1. What isn’t working?

My observations have been a lack of:

2. Will NTER lay the basis for a sustainable and better future for residents of remote communities and town camps in the NT?

Unlikely as there hasn’t been a priority on working together to produce a sustainable model of health service delivery that includes an allied health and education service for the future. More allied health professionals are needed working in multidisciplinary teams with adequate levels of management and support to achieve a sustainable and better future for residents of remote communities and town camps in the NT. Longer contracts or permanent positions for allied health staff also need to be offered.

3. What alternative measures should be considered?

4. Are there other ways of working that would better address the circumstances facing remote communities and town camps?

Return to top