Skip to content

FaHCSIA home | NTER Review home

NT Emergency Review Panel

As a non-Aboriginal Australian I draw to the attention of every member of the Review Panel to the many academic facts and opinions that are pertinent to the question of whether the Northern Territory Emergency Response (NTER) should continue to be imposed at all, or that of any future Australian Government intercession or enactment that relate to Aboriginal people.

I have used the suite of nine points outlined by the NTER Review Secretariat to develop this personal response; the most significant of these being questions 7, 8 and 9 as they encompass every aspect of the lives and future of Aboriginal children and their communities.

In order to contextualise the NTER and your final proposals to the government, it is vital that panel members recognise that persistent deprivation of rights is directly linked to the high levels of economic, social and cultural disadvantage that exists in Aboriginal communities; this has been the catalyst that led to extreme levels of violence addressed by the NTER. Those appalling conditions developed because Australian Governments’ explicitly denied Aboriginal peoples’ right of self-determination over their education, economy, land, lives and future as documented again and again by authorities over many decades - a brief list from the 10s of 1,000s of such evidence appears below:

This begs the question – when acknowledged facts and opinions plainly refute any strategy that denies Indigenous rights, why would any ‘informed’ government suppose that increasing or sustaining deprivation of rights and welfare will improve the lives of Aboriginal children, their parents and Indigenous communities? To consider further denial of rights through the NTER is a paternalistic approach that, decades of history reflect, will cause further harm rather than secure Aboriginal children’s safety in a secure and prosperous Indigenous environment. (Dr H. Watchirs, ACT Human Rights and Discrimination Commissioner, July, 2008)

Are Governments’ genuinely committed to a sustainable future for Aboriginal communities?

I stress again, if Australian Governments’ are sincerely prepared to enhance Aboriginal well-being, they will be prepared to admit their weakness in promoting Indigenous well-being.

The abysmal nature of decades of mis-management by Australian Governments has caused an unsolicited state of emergency in Aboriginal Communities and seriously undermined and endangered the well-being of Aboriginal children; consequently, it is paramount that they are not permitted to retain their roles for ultimate responsibility and management of Indigenous Australians.

Legislation must be enacted that rightfully ensures Elected Indigenous Community Leaders adopt this role in order to preserve their well-being through self-determination; Governments’ agents should more appropriately, through Legislation, act only in Advisory capacities in all Indigenous matters.

 

Josie Nemorin (Australian Citizen)


Return to top