Skip to content

FaHCSIA home | NTER Review home

Central Australian Specialists Submission to the Review Board of the Northern Territory Emergency Response (NTER)

This submission has been prepared and submitted by a group of Specialist doctors working in Central Australia, and represents a consensus view.

We would like to make the following points:

We recommend:

BACKGROUND

There have been innumerable reports into the state of health and welfare of Indigenous people in Australia over the past decades. Unfortunately these have not to date led to an adequate response for the known disease burden. As health professionals working in Central Australia, we have identified massive inadequacies in funding and resource allocation.

To date, with respect to health, the NTER has been beset with a distressing duplication, at huge cost, with very little benefit derived.

APPROACH TO CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE

It is recognised that child sexual abuse is exacerbated by poor social living conditions.

“A number of structural factors, such as unemployment, housing, gambling, impact on the prevalence of child sexual abuse, particularly when a community is also experiencing a range of other social concerns, such as alcohol abuse. It is sufficient to say that these factors can make it much easier for would-be offenders to abuse children.” 1

It is well recognized, that in both Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities, programmes need to be tailored (i.e. not indiscriminate), and community-owned rather than imposed from outside.2

Crucial to ensuring equal access to health services is ensuring that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are actively involved in the design, delivery, and control of these services3

However the NTER seems to have proceeded in the opposite direction.

“We have witnessed the abandonment of consultation with Indigenous people, diminishing use of available statistical and research evidence and increased marginalisation of the experts - especially if their views diverge from national leadership. These same leaders are increasingly thinking very narrowly about very difficult policy problems and consequently are making poor policy decisions” 4

The holistic model acknowledges that to achieve child protection and wellbeing, the community needs to be healthy. This includes healthy adults. A health based approach to the disadvantage experienced by many Aboriginal Australians includes a community based approach, where health programmes for both children and adults are developed in consultation with the community, funded appropriately, with adequate funding also for centralised services such as hospitals.

There are numerous overseas models for child protection services for Indigenous peoples.

There is no doubt however that this will require increased funding.

THE EVIDENCE BASE FOR THE NORTHERN TERRITORY EMERGENCY RESPONSE

The stated aim of the NTER was to respond to child sexual abuse in remote communities.

However none of the measures in the NTER are evidence based in the international arena. Well established, evidence based practice has been ignored.

Part 2 of the Little Children are Sacred Report, which we endorse, details evidence and research from here in Australia as well as overseas, and is referenced in their recommendations. None of these measures have been implemented by the Australian Government, and indeed many of the measures in the NTER are in direct conflict.

Integral to almost all evidence relating to improving child safety, community safety and overall health are the requirements for any measure to be both (i) culturally appropriate, and (ii) to increase the degree of control at both an individual and community level.

Furthermore, it is accepted that to improve the health of a community, resources need to be put into housing, education and other infrastructure.

INADEQUACIES IDENTIFIED IN THE NTER FROM A HEALTH PERSPECTIVE

Consultation

Minister Macklin gave a speech one year after the NTER was launched, in which she referred to the 1st recommendation of the Little Children are Sacred report,

“that ‘Aboriginal child sexual abuse in the Northern Territory should be designated as an issue of national significance by both the Australian and Northern Territory governments'.

However the second sentence of that recommendation also stated:

“It is critical that both governments commit to genuine consultation with Aboriginal people in designing initiatives for Aboriginal communities”

Rex Wild, co-author of this report stated in June 2008

“They read, and acted upon, the first sentence of the first recommendation and ignored the rest. That recommendation, set out above, was absolutely clear. No solution should be imposed from above."5

We believe that it is essential that consultation with Aboriginal people is a cornerstone of designing initiatives to improve their health.

Human Rights

The Social Justice Report 2007, released by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, strongly argues that there needs to be “substantial change” to the NTER for it to be consistent with Australia’s international human rights obligations. It recommends a human rights approach to tackling family violence and child abuse, and gives numerous examples of community based initiatives.

We believe that any intervention needs to recognize human rights, including the rights of Indigenous peoples.

Efficient use of money and the health checks

In the one year since the NTER was legislated, nearly 11,000 children have received a child health check. This has been resource intensive and disrupted existing health services and any health benefits remain dubious as almost all health problems diagnosed were already identified.

To our knowledge, only one child in Central Australia has been identified with significant health problems that were not already known.

Many of the health practitioners involved in the screening had little or no experience in the area. Many children were referred for unnecessary investigations at great cost and causing further disruption to existing services.

The NTER lead to a decrease in morale of staff who had been providing services in this area for many years.

We believe that this massive duplication, at huge cost has been a waste of money. We would rather have seen collaboration with hospital staff and medical staff on remote communities, and believe that far better uses of that money could have been devised.

We hope that future health initiatives are embarked upon only after consultation with those health experts already working in the Northern Territory.

We believe that treatment of identified health problems such as heart, ear, eye and dental problems needs to have ongoing, continuous funding. These services have been required for many years.

HEALTH SERVICES REQUIRED

The National Indigenous Health Equality Summit, held in Canberra, March 18–20, 2008, tabled the National Indigenous Health Equality Targets Outcomes, which was signed by Prime Minister Rudd, Ministers Macklin and Roxon, and others.

Its aims are to close the disturbing gap in morbidity and mortality between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians.

It made recommendations, which we believe are salient to health service delivery in Central Australia, as well as nationally.

Some of the recommendations are reproduced below.

Despite these recommendations, many such services in Central Australia are funded at an inadequate level making it impossible to sustain services.

It is essential that these services are maintained, increased, and appropriately paid.

Some specific programmes that we believe need to be developed include:

Community based programmes

We believe there must be investment in community based programs focusing on healthy children and families using principles of community development. These programmes must have committed long term funding.

Examples include

Staffing

Staff training and improvement of existing health staff and services needs to occur.

We believe short term staff should only be used when longer term staff cannot be found and must always leave the existing service in stronger shape than when they arrived and should never again be paid at significantly higher rates than the ‘long-termers’.

Other services, outside the scope of this paper to discuss in detail, but essential if any long term health benefits are to accrue, include

RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT

We believe, in concordance with others such as the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, that the Racial Discrimination Act must be reinstated.

IN SUMMARY

The health and socio-economic state of the Indigenous population of Australia, in particular in Central Australia is dire and does constitute a national emergency.

Improvements will only come with engagement and collaboration with the Indigenous community. Any improvement in health status will require a significant investment both in the social determinates of health (cultural wellbeing, housing, education, employment) and in health services.

The following Specialists from Central Australia and others have personally endorsed this submission:

Dr Rob Roseby, FRACP, Paediatrician

Dr Rose Fahy, FRACP, Paediatrician

Dr Tors Clothier, FRACP, Paediatrician

Dr Debbie Fearon, FRACP, Paediatrician

Dr Alina Iser, FRACP, Paediatrician

Dr Clare MacVicar, FRACP, Paediatrician

Dr Tim Henderson, FRCOphth, FRANZCO Ophthalmologist

Dr Stephen Brady, FRACP, Physician

Dr Nadarajah Rajabalendran, FRCP, Physician

Dr Carl Schultz, MD, Physician

Dr Terry Howison, FRACP, Physician

Dr Ciara O’Sullivan, FRACP, Remote Physician

Dr Basant Pawar, MD, DM, Renal Physician

Dr Cherian Sajiv, FRACP, Renal Physician

Dr Greg McNaulty, FANZCA, Anaesthetist and Intensive Care Specialist

Dr Penny Stewart, FANZCA, FJFICM, Intensive Care Specialist

Dr Simon Kane, FRANZCOG, Obstetrician and Gynaecologist

Dr Megan Halliday, FRANZCOG, Obstetrician and Gynaecologist

Dr Rosalie Schultz, FAFPHM, Public Health Physician

Dr Hilary Tyler, FACEM, Emergency Physician

Dr Keith Nallaratnam, FACEM, Emergency Physician

Dr Paul Helliwell, FACEM, Emergency Physician

Dr Michael Thumm, FANZCA, Anaesthetist

Dr Heidi Robertshaw, FRCA, Anaesthetist

Dr Mahesh Ganji, MBBS, MD, Anaesthetist

Dr Bandulasena Palapitige, Orthopaedic Consultant

Dr Marcus Tabart, FRANZCP, Psychiatrist

Dr Prosper Abusah, FRANZCP, Psychiatrist

Dr Stephen Foster, FRACGP, District Medical Officer

Dr Paul Secombe, BMBS, Junior Medical Officer Representative


1. Ampe Akelyernemane Meke Mekarle - Little Children are Sacred report, p6

2. Ampe Akelyernemane Meke Mekarle - Little Children are Sacred report. p276

3. Close the Gap - National Indigenous Health Equality Targets Outcomes from the National Indigenous Health Equality Summit, Canberra, March 18–20, 2008

4. The Howard Government’s Northern Territory Intervention: Are Neo-Paternalism and Indigenous Development Compatible?, J.C. Altman, p7 Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Topical Issue No. 16/2007 An electronic publication downloaded from <http://www.anu.edu.au/caepr/>

5. http://www.getup.org.au/blogs/view.php?id=1341

Return to top